In this post we will
talk about the native American population after the arrival of the Europeans.
So we are going to see the evolution of the population and the consequence of
that arrival. We are also trying to understand the reasons that can explain it.
We are going to use the following article: “The rate of Population Change in
Central Mexico, 1550-1570”, which was written by Cook and Borah, and published
in “The Hispanic American Historical Review”.
After Cook and Borah´s
article the question of the demography of the colonization became
international. But we have to say that the authors weren´t historians, they
were professors at the Berkeley university of California, so we should not take
this information as absolutely certain.
The main idea of the article
is that after the conquest, the population of Mexico decreased, between 1550
and 1570, a 2-4 % every year, not only due to epidemics, also the deterioration
on nutrition or the forced work. They are demographers, from USA. They need
taxation records because they need mathematical and statistical dates in order
to introduce them into equations. They are also accurate dates because the
state was interested on it, so he could recollect taxes. But the records
securely aren´t real because in a context of conquest they probably lie. They
use this documentation thinking that is very accurate. (Sometimes the diseases
arrive decades before the Spaniards arrive to a place). So those new proposed
causes were voluntaries , not as the epidemics, other causes as overwork or
killings.
·
In favor:
First of all, we are going to explain our point
comparing the epidemics in Central mexico to the other ones epidemics in Europe
and other countries, then, we are to explain the different causes and
consequences that we consider that are interfering in the population decrease.
What we are
going to see here is a comparison between the consequences of the different
epidemic diseases in another countries, and after analyzing them, we can say that the epidemics are not
enough to explain the decrease of the native population of America. So we have
to include other facts, which are not so obvious.
We can divide the facts into two groups:
Main facts:
“…disease; the systematic killing, ill-treatment, and
overwork of the Indians; the disruption of Indian economies and societies
caused by conquest and colonization, including its psychological impact; and
miscegenation.”
-
Forced
work/Overwork and systematic killing:
“The main porpoise of the Spaniards
was to civilizate and Christianize them and to exploit them as sources of profit and labor.”
The Spanish conquers established
different kinds of forced works to obtain the most profits from the native
population. At the first period, we have to talk about the encomienda, which
was a work that natives have to do in exchange of being Christianised. Then,
this system was substituted by the repartimiento. Another factor to take into
account is the mita, the forced work
which was used in the mines,
“In most areas,
the abolition of personal service under the encomienda was replaced by a system
of forced labour, the repartimiento.”
“The repartimiento functioned best in Mexico and Peru,
where it was more closely supervised and where large numbers of Indians were
concentrated who could provide a labour force of reasonable size
“The Indians were reluctant to move into the missions,
force was employed, and Indians were often killed.”
“The mita constituted a large, cheap,
dependable source of labour compared to free labour, which was poorly disciplined
and difficult to attract”.
-
Disruption
of Indian economies and societies psychological impact:
.
-
Miscegenation
The colonos who arrived to America, were only
men, and because of that they had to procreate with native women. This has two
main social and demographic consequences: the first one, the indigenous could
not procreate as it was before the conquest, consequently their demographic
number was less and less numerous.
The second one, in a social aspect, the indigenous
lost their own basic culture by the Christianization and the
acculturation.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
COOK AND BORAH, "The rate of population change in Central Mexico, 1551-1570" in The Hispanic American Historical Review
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario